Secondary Education Examination (SEE-2079) Results Statistics

The National Examination Board has officially announced the results of the Secondary Education Examination (SEE) for the year 2079. A total of 484,939 students participated in this annual examination.

GPA Distribution Among Students

• A total of 22,475 students attained a GPA between 3.6 and 4.0. This represents approximately 4.63% of the total student body.
• There were 55,069 students who scored a GPA between 3.2 and 3.6. This category accounts for 11.63% of the overall students.
• In the GPA bracket of 2.8 to 3.2, we saw 72,362 students. This is equivalent to 14.92% of the total participants.
• A sizable portion of 89,331 students received a GPA ranging from 2.4 to 2.8, making up 18.42% of the student population.
• A segment of students, specifically 102,293, achieved a GPA between 2.0 and 2.4. This represented 21.09% of all students.
• 88,447 students landed a GPA between 1.6 and 2.0. This contributes to 18.24% of the total number of participants.
• A comparatively smaller group of 38,770 students received a GPA between 1.2 and 1.6, representing 7.99% of the total.
• Finally, 2,000 students achieved a GPA between 0.8 and 1.2. This accounts for a slim 0.45% of the total students.

Comparative Analysis of Secondary Education Examination (SEE-2079) Results

Here is a comprehensive comparative analysis of the Secondary Education Examination results based on the provided data:

1. High Achievers (3.6 to 4 GPA): High achievers, who scored between 3.6 and 4, were the smallest group, making up only 4.63% of the total students. This indicates that only a small fraction of students managed to secure top grades, suggesting a high level of competition or rigorous examination standards.

2. Above Average (3.2 to 3.6 GPA): The number of students achieving a GPA between 3.2 and 3.6, classified as above average performers, increased to 11.63%. It shows that a more significant number of students fall into the slightly above average performance category.

3. Average Performers (2.8 to 3.2 GPA): The number of average performers (those who scored between 2.8 and 3.2) was 14.92%, showing a further increase in student numbers. This trend indicates a high concentration of students in the average scoring range.

4. Below Average (2.4 to 2.8 GPA): Below average performers, those who scored between 2.4 and 2.8, saw another jump with 18.42% of the total, suggesting that a substantial portion of students falls within this category.

5. Lower Performers (2 to 2.4 GPA): The largest group of students fell within the lower performance range (2 to 2.4 GPA) making up 21.09% of the total. This data could suggest a need for more targeted academic support for a significant portion of the student population.

6. Significantly Below Average (1.6 to 2 GPA): The number of students who scored between 1.6 and 2 was nearly as large as the previous category, comprising 18.24% of the total.

7. Low Performers (1.2 to 1.6 GPA and 0.8 to 1.2 GPA): The number of low performers (1.2 to 1.6 GPA) dropped to 7.99% and further dropped to just 0.45% for the lowest category (0.8 to 1.2 GPA). These figures may highlight areas where students are struggling the most and where intervention could have the biggest impact.

8. Absent or One Subject Only: The fact that 2.89% of students were either absent or appeared for only one subject could indicate various factors, such as health issues, lack of preparation, or other personal circumstances, impacting their participation.

Overall, the majority of students fall within the below-average to average range, suggesting that targeted interventions at these levels could significantly improve overall performance. On the other hand, the number of high achievers is comparatively low, indicating a need for programs to challenge and further develop high-performing students. The low-performing students, while fewer in number, require special attention to ensure they get the necessary support to improve their academic performance.

SEE NEB